mirror of
https://github.com/Laex/Delphi-OpenCV.git
synced 2024-11-15 15:55:53 +01:00
140 lines
4.6 KiB
Plaintext
140 lines
4.6 KiB
Plaintext
1. Title: Wisconsin Diagnostic Breast Cancer (WDBC)
|
|
|
|
2. Source Information
|
|
|
|
a) Creators:
|
|
|
|
Dr. William H. Wolberg, General Surgery Dept., University of
|
|
Wisconsin, Clinical Sciences Center, Madison, WI 53792
|
|
wolberg@eagle.surgery.wisc.edu
|
|
|
|
W. Nick Street, Computer Sciences Dept., University of
|
|
Wisconsin, 1210 West Dayton St., Madison, WI 53706
|
|
street@cs.wisc.edu 608-262-6619
|
|
|
|
Olvi L. Mangasarian, Computer Sciences Dept., University of
|
|
Wisconsin, 1210 West Dayton St., Madison, WI 53706
|
|
olvi@cs.wisc.edu
|
|
|
|
b) Donor: Nick Street
|
|
|
|
c) Date: November 1995
|
|
|
|
3. Past Usage:
|
|
|
|
first usage:
|
|
|
|
W.N. Street, W.H. Wolberg and O.L. Mangasarian
|
|
Nuclear feature extraction for breast tumor diagnosis.
|
|
IS&T/SPIE 1993 International Symposium on Electronic Imaging: Science
|
|
and Technology, volume 1905, pages 861-870, San Jose, CA, 1993.
|
|
|
|
OR literature:
|
|
|
|
O.L. Mangasarian, W.N. Street and W.H. Wolberg.
|
|
Breast cancer diagnosis and prognosis via linear programming.
|
|
Operations Research, 43(4), pages 570-577, July-August 1995.
|
|
|
|
Medical literature:
|
|
|
|
W.H. Wolberg, W.N. Street, and O.L. Mangasarian.
|
|
Machine learning techniques to diagnose breast cancer from
|
|
fine-needle aspirates.
|
|
Cancer Letters 77 (1994) 163-171.
|
|
|
|
W.H. Wolberg, W.N. Street, and O.L. Mangasarian.
|
|
Image analysis and machine learning applied to breast cancer
|
|
diagnosis and prognosis.
|
|
Analytical and Quantitative Cytology and Histology, Vol. 17
|
|
No. 2, pages 77-87, April 1995.
|
|
|
|
W.H. Wolberg, W.N. Street, D.M. Heisey, and O.L. Mangasarian.
|
|
Computerized breast cancer diagnosis and prognosis from fine
|
|
needle aspirates.
|
|
Archives of Surgery 1995;130:511-516.
|
|
|
|
W.H. Wolberg, W.N. Street, D.M. Heisey, and O.L. Mangasarian.
|
|
Computer-derived nuclear features distinguish malignant from
|
|
benign breast cytology.
|
|
Human Pathology, 26:792--796, 1995.
|
|
|
|
See also:
|
|
http://www.cs.wisc.edu/~olvi/uwmp/mpml.html
|
|
http://www.cs.wisc.edu/~olvi/uwmp/cancer.html
|
|
|
|
Results:
|
|
|
|
- predicting field 2, diagnosis: B = benign, M = malignant
|
|
- sets are linearly separable using all 30 input features
|
|
- best predictive accuracy obtained using one separating plane
|
|
in the 3-D space of Worst Area, Worst Smoothness and
|
|
Mean Texture. Estimated accuracy 97.5% using repeated
|
|
10-fold crossvalidations. Classifier has correctly
|
|
diagnosed 176 consecutive new patients as of November
|
|
1995.
|
|
|
|
4. Relevant information
|
|
|
|
Features are computed from a digitized image of a fine needle
|
|
aspirate (FNA) of a breast mass. They describe
|
|
characteristics of the cell nuclei present in the image.
|
|
A few of the images can be found at
|
|
http://www.cs.wisc.edu/~street/images/
|
|
|
|
Separating plane described above was obtained using
|
|
Multisurface Method-Tree (MSM-T) [K. P. Bennett, "Decision Tree
|
|
Construction Via Linear Programming." Proceedings of the 4th
|
|
Midwest Artificial Intelligence and Cognitive Science Society,
|
|
pp. 97-101, 1992], a classification method which uses linear
|
|
programming to construct a decision tree. Relevant features
|
|
were selected using an exhaustive search in the space of 1-4
|
|
features and 1-3 separating planes.
|
|
|
|
The actual linear program used to obtain the separating plane
|
|
in the 3-dimensional space is that described in:
|
|
[K. P. Bennett and O. L. Mangasarian: "Robust Linear
|
|
Programming Discrimination of Two Linearly Inseparable Sets",
|
|
Optimization Methods and Software 1, 1992, 23-34].
|
|
|
|
|
|
This database is also available through the UW CS ftp server:
|
|
|
|
ftp ftp.cs.wisc.edu
|
|
cd math-prog/cpo-dataset/machine-learn/WDBC/
|
|
|
|
5. Number of instances: 569
|
|
|
|
6. Number of attributes: 32 (ID, diagnosis, 30 real-valued input features)
|
|
|
|
7. Attribute information
|
|
|
|
1) ID number
|
|
2) Diagnosis (M = malignant, B = benign)
|
|
3-32)
|
|
|
|
Ten real-valued features are computed for each cell nucleus:
|
|
|
|
a) radius (mean of distances from center to points on the perimeter)
|
|
b) texture (standard deviation of gray-scale values)
|
|
c) perimeter
|
|
d) area
|
|
e) smoothness (local variation in radius lengths)
|
|
f) compactness (perimeter^2 / area - 1.0)
|
|
g) concavity (severity of concave portions of the contour)
|
|
h) concave points (number of concave portions of the contour)
|
|
i) symmetry
|
|
j) fractal dimension ("coastline approximation" - 1)
|
|
|
|
Several of the papers listed above contain detailed descriptions of
|
|
how these features are computed.
|
|
|
|
The mean, standard error, and "worst" or largest (mean of the three
|
|
largest values) of these features were computed for each image,
|
|
resulting in 30 features. For instance, field 3 is Mean Radius, field
|
|
13 is Radius SE, field 23 is Worst Radius.
|
|
|
|
All feature values are recoded with four significant digits.
|
|
|
|
8. Missing attribute values: none
|
|
|
|
9. Class distribution: 357 benign, 212 malignant |